PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research
Pass percentage of our students during "April/May 2023 - Anna University Examinations" is 84.67% (Before Revaluation)    
Programmes Offered
PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research
Pass percentage of our students during "April/May 2023 - Anna University Examinations" is 84.67% (Before Revaluation)   
Programmes Offered


Extended Profile
Criterion 1
Criterion 2
Criterion 3
Criterion 4
Criterion 5
Criterion 6
Criterion 7
DVV Clarifications
Additional Information

Criterion 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation

2.1 – Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1 (QnM) Enrolment percentage
2.1.2 (QnM) Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST,
OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the
last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)
2.2 – Student Teacher Ratio
Student - Full time Teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)           
2.3 – Teaching-Learning Process
2.3.1 (QlM) Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and
problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
using ICT tools
2.4 – Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1 (QnM) Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the
last five years
2.4.2 (QnM) Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B
Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
(consider only highest degree for count)
2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1 (QlM) Mechanism of internal / external assessment is transparent and the grievance
redressal system is time- bound and efficient
2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcome
2.6.1 (QlM) Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes
offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment
of POs and COs are evaluated
2.6.2 (QnM) Pass percentage of students during last five years
2.7 – Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 (QnM) Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.
(Online survey to be conducted)

Criterion 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension

3.1 – Resource Mobilization for Research
3.1.1 (QnM) Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for
research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years
(INR in Lakhs)
3.2 – Innovation Ecosystem
3.2.1 (QlM) Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for
creation and transfer of knowledge (patents filed, published, incubation center
facilities in the HEI to be considered)
3.2.2 (QnM) Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including on Research Methodology,
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during
the last five years
3.3 – Research Publication and Awards
3.3.1 (QnM) Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on
UGC care list during the last five years
3.3.2 (QnM) Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books published and papers
published in national / international conference proceedings
per teacher during last five years
3.4 – Extension Activities
3.4.1 (QlM) Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing
students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof
during the last five years.
3.4.2 (QlM) Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government /
government recognised bodies
3.4.3 (QnM) Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution
through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., (including the programmes such as
Swachh Bharat, AIDS awareness, Gender issues etc. and/or those organised
in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs) during the last five years
3.5 – Collaboration
3.5.1 (QnM) The number of MoUs, collaborations/linkages for Faculty exchange,
Student exchange, Internship, Field trip, On-the-job training, research and
other academic activities during the last five years

Criterion 5 – Student Support and Progression

5.1 – Student Support
5.1.1 (QnM) Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the
Government and Non-Government agencies during last five years
5.1.2 (QnM) Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution
include the following
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene)
4. ICT/computing skills
5.1.3 (QnM) Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and
career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years
5.1.4 (QnM) The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student
grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees
5.2 – Student Progression
5.2.1 (QnM) Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to
higher education during the last five years
5.2.2 (QnM) Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level
examinations during the last five years
(eg: JAM/CLAT/GATE/ GMAT/ CAT/ GRE/ TOEFL/ Civil Services/
State government examinations)
5.3 – Student Participation and Activities
5.3.1 (QnM) Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural
activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a
team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.2 (QnM) Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of
the Institution participated during last five years
(organised by the institution/other institutions)
5.4 – Alumni Engagement
5.4.1 (QlM) There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to
the development of the institution through financial
and/or other support services

Criterion 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management

6.1 – Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1 (QlM) The governance and leadership is in accordance with vision and mission of
the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as
decentralization and participation in the institutional governance
6.2 – Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1 (QlM) The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as
visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules,
procedures, deployment of institutional Strategic /
perspective / development plan etc
6.2.2 (QnM) Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
1. Administration
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination
6.3 – Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1 (QlM) The institution has effective welfare measures and Performance Appraisal
System for teaching and non-teaching staff
6.3.2 (QnM) Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies
during the last five years
6.3.3 (QnM) Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty
development Programmes (FDP), professional development / administrative
training programs during the last five years
6.4 – Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.4.1 (QlM) Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources
and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations)
and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)
6.5 – Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 (QlM) Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for
institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews
teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of
operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records
the incremental improvement in various activities
6.5.2 (QnM) Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback
    collected, analysed and used for improvements
2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)/ membership of
    international networks
3. Participation in NIRF
4. any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national
    or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc

Criterion 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices

7.1 – Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
Gender Equity and celebration of days of National/International commemoration
7.1.1 (QlM) Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity
and Institutional initiatives to celebrate/organize national and international
commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five years
Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability and Divyangjan friendly initiatives
7.1.2 (QnM) The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste
3. Water conservation
4. Green campus initiatives
5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment
7.1.3 (QnM) Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken
by the Institution.
The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed
through the following
1. Green audit / Environment audit
2. Energy audit
3. Clean and green campus initiatives
4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities
Inclusion, Situatedness, Human values & professional ethics
7.1.4 (QlM) Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment
i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal
socioeconomic and Sensitization of students and employees to the
constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens.
7.2 – Best Practices
7.2.1 (QlM) Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per
NAAC format provided in the Manual.
7.3 – Institutional Distinctiveness
7.3.1 (QlM) Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority
and thrust within 1000 words